Frequently Asked Questions. What are slow-start and congestion avoidance algorithms? Slow-start algorithm is part of the congestion control in TCP, designed to avoid sending more data than the network is capable of transmitting. Slow-start algorithm works by increasing the TCP Window by one segment for each acknowledged segment. This behavior effectively doubles the TCP Window size each round trip of the network. The algorithm continues increasing until this "congestion window" cwnd reaches the size of the receivers advertised TCP Receive Window RWINor until packet loss occurs.
If packet loss occurs, TCP assumes this it is due to network congestion and takes steps to reduce the offered load on the network.
TCP then enters the linear growth congestion avoidance phase. At this point, the window is increased linearly by 1 segment for each RTT. There is a variation to the slow-start algorithm known as fast recovery. In the fast recovery algorithm, during congestion avoidance mode, when packets detected through 3 duplicate ACKs are not received, the congestion window size is reduced to half it's size slow-start treshold rather than the much smaller initial value.
Pandora FMS – The Monitoring Blog
See also: RFC Is 5GHz Wireless better than 2. What is the actual real-life speed of wireless networks? I can't connect to my router's admin interface? Access Point? What is considered good DSL line attenuation? Outlook cannot connect to your mail server? How to delete cookies for a specific website in Chrome?
Asus router Traffic Analyzer - Statistic empty? How to tune my router's advanced Wi-Fi settings? How to change the Remote Desktop default port number? Outlook does not let you enter mail username? Fast path vs. Interleave mode to reduce latency? All rights reserved. Broadband Forums General Discussions. Telefonica Incompetence, Xenophobia or Fraud? Wireless Networks and WEP. Tiny Software Personal Firewall v1.
Linksys Instant GigaDrive. Why encrypt your online traffic with VPN?Project Code Bank. Search this site. We've become coddicted Check out our new home Navigation Welcome!!! About us Addressing Modes. C Calling convention and stack. Cache Memory. Closure Properties of Languages. Thread States. Graph Based Protocol. Tree Based Protocol.
Timestamp Based Protocol. Validation Based Protocol. Wait-die and Wound-wait Schemes.Computer Networks: GATE 2012 TCP Congestion Control
Concurrency Control. Context Switch. Decidability of Languages. Floyd's Algorithm for shortest path.This post is also available in : Spanish. TCP congestion control is a fundamental part of this protocol and over the years has undergone a process of constant improvement through the generation of different versions, such as TCP Tahoe, Reno, Vegas, and so on. Thus, the basic implementation is known as the receive window, in which, per connection, a window size is set that represents the amount of packets that the sender can send to the receiver without waiting for recognition packets ACK packets.
However, the slider protocol manages the connection based on the buffer capacities of the receiving equipment, but it does not recognize the congestion problems associated with the network. To adjust the transmission depending on the level of congestion, TCP introduces another window.
Algorithms propose things like how many not received ACK packets involve congestion, how much to decrease or increase the cwnd window, how to calculate the transfer rate from the congestion window, etc.
Then we suggest you to review the evolution of these algorithms in order to have a clear understanding of the scope of those currently in use. Up to that point, streaming control based on sliding windows had worked quite well, but with the popularization of the Internet, congestion became a problem.
Between andVan Jacobson proposed the basic congestion control scheme and developed the first implementation protocol, known as TCP Tahoe. The transmission ratio should take into account the value of the reception and congestion windows, leaving the transmitter restricted to a transmission ratio whose minimum value is rwnd and its maximum is cwnd.
After TCP Reno other algorithms and versions of TCP appeared that tried to take the precepts of congestion control and refine it, experiencing a great diversification of versions and scopes. Thus we have that TCP Vegas raises attention to the values of delay to infer congestion or the case of ECN Explicit Congestion Notification that introduces the possibility that the routers of the network notify congestion conditions to the transmitting equipment.
In a network composed of wide bandwidth links, a congestion control algorithm that slowly increases the transmission rate may end up wasting the capacity of the links. The intention is to have an algorithm that works with congestion windows whose incremental processes are more aggressive, but are restricted from overloading the network.
In order to achieve this, it is proposed that the scheme for increasing and decreasing the transmission ratio be established according to a cubic function. As we can see, CUBIC implements schemes of large increments at first, which decrease around the window size that caused the last congestion, and then continue to increase with large increments.
An interesting point of congestion control provided by TCP is that these are processes with the following characteristics:. However, we propose you to think about the scope of a general purpose monitoring tool like Pandora FMS from the angle of these algorithms. Have a look at this interesting article on bandwidth monitoring. In addition, if you do not yet have a monitoring tool for the platform, you should know that you have come to the right place.GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account. From susant. From bltierney es. From jef. From ssahani redhat. Not sure. Not sure we want to transmit the setting from client to server, the other alternative is to specify it separately on the two sides.
Shouldn't it be strlen instead? That last part is the only thing still missing in this version of the patch. I'm not sure what the problem is with perr. The setsockopt man page says it sets errno so that should work.
Oh wait, you're calling close - that probably overwrites errno even if it succeeds. I guess all the other setsockopt calls and the bind call have the same problem and no one ever noticed.
My eyes were looking for strdup and missed that. Although this is assigned to Bruce I will probably do it later tonight. Now that we have hashed it out, it's just a matter of applying the patch and testing, and I want to log another hour for this week.
Someone needs to test whether it's actually working though! First step would be to find a list of valid congestion control algorithm names. However it's still giving "file not found". I put in a printf to be sure - yep, that's really the errno. Is it possible that's the actual error code returned when you ask for an algorithm that doesn't exist?
Here is a doc speaks about the list. I think It can be added to wiki how to figure out what are the available congestion control algo. This is what I could pick from the kernel makefile. I confirmed that my test hosts accept cubic and htcp. Don't know how to verify that they actually do anything different. Perhaps we just have to accept that part on faith.Thank you, truly appreciate the straightforward verbiage and time taken in comparisons, not to mention personal input concerning battery life, you saved me a lot of busy work.
Really nice article, it helps to underestand how it works and what's the better option! Thanks for the efforts. Waw very cool article hope you will do articles which deal with TCP Optimisation!!! Thank you for this. This was the one dd-wrt option i had no clue about.
Noticed latency and raw bandwidth is best using westwood algorithm on my netgear wndr with ddwrt. Thanks for helping me make an informed choice when it comes to TCP congestion algorithms. Thank you very much for making all of this actually make sense. That's a unique and specific skill-set. Well done and thank you.
Thank you man. Lots of love from Hungary. Post a Comment Please respect the admin of the website and don't post spam! Spam will be removed through moderation so you will be wasting time if you do so! Post something meaningful that will help the developer or others : If spam becomes a problem, I will remove the ability to create comments once again. TCP Algorithms. Compatible kernel managers e. BIC is optimized for high speed networks with high latency: so-called "long fat networks".
Pandora FMS – The Monitoring Blog
This algorithm tries to find the maximum where to keep the window at for a long period of time, by using a binary search algorithm. Scalable calls for congestion window to be halved for each packet lost. Effectively, this process keeps halving the throughput until packet loss stops.
Once the packet loss subsides, slow start kicks in to ramp the speed back up. Illinois is designed for high-speed, long-distance networks. A sender side modification to the standard TCP congestion control algorithm, it achieves a higher average throughput than the standard TCP and allocates the network resource fairly as the standard TCP. Its purpose is to target high efficiency, fairness, and minimizing link loss while keeping network elements load as low as possible.
For stability: - Cubic - Best. For high latency networks:. For general usage:. Unknown 13 March at Unknown 25 January at Mrethiopian gmail. Unknown 16 February at Lennon Roberto 16 February at Faddy 7 March at The TCP congestion-avoidance algorithm is the primary basis for congestion control in the Internet.
There are several variations and versions of the algorithm implemented in protocol stacks of operating systems of computers that connect to the Internet. To avoid congestive collapseTCP uses a multi-faceted congestion-control strategy. For each connection, TCP maintains a congestion windowlimiting the total number of unacknowledged packets that may be in transit end-to-end. This is somewhat analogous to TCP's sliding window used for flow control.
TCP uses a mechanism called slow start  to increase the congestion window after a connection is initialized or after a timeout. It starts with a window, a small multiple of the maximum segment size MSS in size. When the congestion window exceeds the slow-start threshold, ssthresh[a] the algorithm enters a new state, called congestion avoidance.
In congestion avoidance state, as long as non-duplicate ACKs are received [b] the congestion window is additively increased by one MSS every round-trip time.
In TCP, the congestion window is one of the factors that determines the number of bytes that can be sent out at any time. The congestion window is maintained by the sender and is a means of stopping a link between the sender and the receiver from becoming overloaded with too much traffic. This should not to be confused with the sliding window maintained by the receiver which exists to prevent the receiver from becoming overloaded.
The congestion window is calculated by estimating how much congestion there is on the link. When a connection is set up, the congestion window, a value maintained independently at each host, is set to a small multiple of the MSS allowed on that connection.
Further variance in the congestion window is dictated by an AIMD approach. This means that if all segments are received and the acknowledgments reach the sender on time, some constant is added to the window size. The window keeps growing until a timeout occurs. On timeout:. A system administrator may adjust the maximum window size limit, or adjust the constant added during additive increase, as part of TCP tuning.
The flow of data over a TCP connection is also controlled by the use of the receive window advertised by the receiver. By comparing its own congestion window with the receive windowa sender can determine how much data it may send at any given time. Slow start is part of the congestion control strategy used by TCP in conjunction with other algorithms to avoid sending more data than the network is capable of forwarding, that is, to avoid causing network congestion.
The algorithm is specified by RFC Although the strategy is referred to as slow start, its congestion window growth is quite aggressive, more aggressive than the congestion avoidance phase. If a loss event occurs, TCP assumes that it is due to network congestion and takes steps to reduce the offered load on the network.
These measurements depend on the exact TCP congestion avoidance algorithm used. Once ssthresh is reached, TCP changes from slow-start algorithm to the linear growth congestion avoidance algorithm. At this point, the window is increased by 1 segment for each round-trip delay time RTT. Slow start assumes that unacknowledged segments are due to network congestion. While this is an acceptable assumption for many networks, segments may be lost for other reasons, such as poor data link layer transmission quality.
Thus, slow start can perform poorly in situations with poor reception, such as wireless networks. The slow start protocol also performs badly for short-lived connections. Older web browsers would create many consecutive short-lived connections to the web server, and would open and close the connection for each file requested. This kept most connections in the slow start mode, which resulted in poor response time.
To avoid this problem, modern browsers either open multiple connections simultaneously or reuse one connection for all files requested from a particular web server. Connections, however, cannot be reused for the multiple third-party servers used by web sites to implement web advertisingsharing features of social networking services and counter scripts of web analytics. AIMD combines linear growth of the congestion window with an exponential reduction when a congestion takes place.
Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It only takes a minute to sign up. I noticed doing netsh interface tcp show global that Add-On Congresion Control Provider was set to none. What does that mean exactly? I'm guessing it means it uses windows default Congestion Control? What is the default for windows anyway?
The short description is: If you're expecting to be running applications that have a large volume of data in Sends that may be unacknowledged at any point, CTCP may help when large-latency networks are involved. It seems that Microsoft has now set the default congestion control algorithm to Cubic for Windows Server Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered.
TCP congestion control
Asked 9 years, 1 month ago. Active 4 months ago. Viewed 8k times. Mark Henderson Active Oldest Votes. TristanK TristanK 8, 2 2 gold badges 22 22 silver badges 33 33 bronze badges. Pierz Pierz 2 2 silver badges 6 6 bronze badges. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password.